Why Human Guidance Still Matters in the Age of AI
For most students, the college application personal essay is a dreaded task. They struggle not only with what to say, but also with the pressure of competing against millions of other applicants. In 2023–24 alone, more than 9.4 million first-year college applications were submitted. It’s the perfect breeding ground for stress.
Feeling overwhelmed, it’s understandable that students consider turning to artificial intelligence for help. Even colleges send mixed signals. Brown University states that AI use is “not permitted under any circumstances,” while the University of California allows limited use, emphasizing that “content and final written text must be their own.”
Meanwhile, AI detection software continues to improve, and many schools warn that if an essay is flagged as AI-generated, the application may be rejected outright. The stakes are high.
At Sage Hill, our goal is to provide the kind of thoughtful, personalized support that helps students feel confident in their own abilities—so they don’t feel drawn to rely on AI.
Colleges encourage students to seek help with brainstorming and editing from parents, counselors, and tutors because these adults are invested in nurturing a student’s unique voice. Still, striking the right balance between supporting a student and taking over can be tricky—and it’s certainly not something to hand off to a machine.
Under pressure and lacking confidence, students may begin to doubt their own ideas. This past year, several students confided in me that they allowed AI to expand on their thoughts because, as they put it, “AI can do it so much better than me.” These comments reveal a troubling sense of disempowerment.
But the college application process should be an opportunity for students to recognize their strengths, develop their voice, and gain confidence.
One student sat quietly after reading the essay prompts, eyes downcast. When I gently asked what was wrong, she said she felt that “nothing worthy of writing about” had happened in her life. This was the perfect moment to pause and look inward. I invited her to describe three recent experiences that felt meaningful—without judging their importance through a college admissions lens.
As she spoke, her confidence began to grow. She realized she did, in fact, have meaningful stories to tell. One experience stood out, but soon her worried expression returned. When I encouraged her to explain, she admitted, “It might make me look weak. I was afraid to sign up for that summer program. I thought no one would like me, and I’d feel left out.”
Another perfect teaching moment.
I reminded her that colleges aren’t searching for superheroes. They want real students—students who face fear, take risks, and grow. “The important part of your story,” I told her, “is that you did sign up. You did participate. And you found your way to connect.”
While AI can respond to words, it cannot perceive body language, tone, hesitation, or emotion—often the true language of teenagers. Those subtle cues guide us toward deeper insight, encouragement, and connection.
At Sage Hill, we help students uncover their strengths rather than dwell on their fears. Many are surprised when they realize how much courage, resilience, empathy, and determination their experiences reveal—even in moments of challenge or failure.
The right balance of guidance preserves each student’s authentic voice while bringing emerging abilities to light. And perhaps most importantly in this modern age, the process nurtures something AI never can: a genuine connection between two living, breathing people.


